例句與造句

1. Thus, lesser included charges may be dropped, but new charges may not be added.
2. The system may have been perverted by not allowing the lesser included charge of manslaughter to go to the jury.
3. Lastly, the concept of a lesser included charge was key in resolving some questions of double jeopardy and unlawful cumulative punishment.
4. Since other appellate circuits had preferred a different test for lesser included charges, Schmuck successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case.
5. A month-long trial in July 2016 ended with the jury acquitting Bonie of murder charges but convicting him of the lesser included charge of manslaughter.
6. It's difficult to find lesser included charge in a sentence. 用lesser included charge造句挺難的
7. He was found not guilty on three counts of the aggravated rape of Christopher Newsom but was found guilty of the lesser included charges of facilitation of rape.
8. O'Donnell also found Brelo not guilty of a lesser included charge of felonious assault, asserting that Brelo was legally justified in his use of deadly force.
9. He was arrested by federal authorities and lesser included charge of odometer tampering, at the time a misdemeanor, if they did not feel his actions constituted mail fraud.
10. He undertook a lengthy comparison of the elements of the two offenses, separately codified, and concluded that differences in the wording were significant enough that bank larceny could not be a lesser included charge to bank robbery.
11. That test, Fairchild wrote, required that the court dispense with the mutuality provision under which a request for a lesser included charge can be granted only if the other side would also be able to make the same request.
12. But that denial, he continued, was exactly why the jury needed to be able to consider odometer tampering as a lesser included charge . " Because this rational possibility existed based on the record assembled at trial, the defendant was entitled to a lesser instruction on odometer tampering ."
13. Turning to the lesser included charge, Blackmun again accepted the prosecution's reading of Rule 31 ( c ) . " The Rule speaks in terms of an offense that is'necessarily included in the offense charged .'This language suggests that the comparison to be drawn is between " offenses ", " he wrote . " Since offenses are statutorily defined, that comparison is appropriately conducted by reference to the statutory elements of the offenses in question . " He further agreed that the inherent-relationship test was inconsistent with that language, and that mutuality was not something that could be discarded so casually since it would violate the long-held constitutional and common law principle that a defendant not be required to answer any charges not in the indictment ."